Today we're taking a look at the new... or not and so new Ryzen 7 5700G. This CPU was released back in April but only for utilize in OEM systems. And then final month AMD said they would release to the full general market alongside the 5600G in August, so next month.

We've been trying to get ane of these APUs for a while, simply it hasn't been as easy in Australia. Then a few weeks dorsum we found an HP Pavilion desktop PC equipped with the 5700G, so we snapped ane up to see what the scrap tin do. Other reviewers accept already tested information technology since the bit has been easier to find in other regions, but considering we're nevertheless 3 weeks away from the retail release, we might as well get testing. We pulled the 5700G out of the HP arrangement, installed it in our AM4 test system and got to it.

But before we get into the testing, let'south quickly discuss what the 5700G and 5600G are all about.

The Ryzen seven 5700G is an 8-cadre, 16-thread processor using AMD's Zen iii architecture, clocking upwardly to iv.vi GHz with a sixteen MB L3 cache and a 65W TDP. But what makes this chip unlike to other Ryzen 5000 serial parts is the integrated graphics, but sadly it'southward non RDNA2 or even RDNA graphics, but rather Vega with 8 compute units clocked upwards to 2 GHz.

This is the same Cezanne die that AMD'southward using for Ryzen Mobile APUs like the Ryzen 9 5900HX, and that ways it's a monolithic die rather than chiplet based. As a effect, along with the fact that AMD has to clasp in the Vega eight GPU, half the L3 cache has been removed, dropping the 5700G downward to 16MB. That'southward probable going to have quite the negative touch on on performance when compared to a part such every bit the 5800X.

Ryzen 9 5900X Ryzen vii 5800X Ryzen 5 5600X Ryzen vii 5700G Ryzen 5 5600G
Release November five, 2020 13 April 2021
MSRP $ $550 $450 $300 $360 $260
Cores / Threads 12 / 24 eight / sixteen half dozen / 12 8 / xvi 6 / 12
iGPU N/A 512:32:8
(8 CU)
448:28:8
(seven CU)
Base
Frequency
3.7 GHz 3.8 GHz 3.7 GHz 3.8 GHz 3.9 GHz
Turbo
Frequency
4.8 GHz 4.vii GHz iv.6 GHz iv.vi GHz 4.4 GHz
L3 Cache 32 MB per CCD (64MB Total) 32 MB 32 MB 16 MB sixteen MB
TDP 105 watts 65 watts

The smaller Ryzen v 5600G is a 6-core model clocked up to 4.4 GHz, the GPU has also been downgraded to but vii Vega compute units clocked upwardly to 1.ix GHz, and the aforementioned 16MB L3 cache.

AMD is positioning these processors as lower-price Zen iii alternatives to the electric current 10-models with no integrated graphics that accept been in the marketplace for months now. The company has acknowledged the demand for non-X CPUs and manifestly these parts are set up to fill that gap.

Unfortunately though, these aren't the budget-friendly CPUs many take been hoping for. The Ryzen 5 5600G is priced at $260 -- just $40 less than the Ryzen 5 5600X -- and non the $200-220 that many people were hoping a Ryzen 5 5600 would slot into.

Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 5700G will sit betwixt the 5600X and 5800X in terms of pricing at $360, which is not the price indicate we would have liked, specially with the big reduction in L3 enshroud and the unfortunate driblet of PCIe 4.0 support in favor of the aging PCIe 3.0 standard.

For testing this APU, we've split into three sections. First we're going to look exclusively at CPU performance, but testing the 5700G in applications using an RTX 2080 Ti and so I can compare information technology with the rest of our CPU data. Then I want to see how well it works with the Vega iGPU and for this I'll be comparison it against the Ryzen v 3400G and the Core i7-11700 using integrated graphics as well as some discrete graphics cards, which were tested on the 5600X.

Finally, we've besides run a battery of discrete GPU tests using the GeForce RTX 3090, to compare the 5700G to a range of other CPUs with a powerful graphics card, so that should be interesting and information technology will give u.s. a good idea of what kind of headroom this APU offers gamers, should they upgrade down the track. Then allow's go into it...

Application Benchmarks

Starting with Cinebench R20 multi-cadre nosotros see that the Ryzen vii 5700G is good for a score of 5432 pts, which is quite adept, though it is slower than the 5800X and 11900K, trailing by effectually a 10% margin.

It was around 9% faster than the 10700K, then there is that, but it appears the lack of L3 cache is hurting performance, given that the core count is identical to the 5800X and clock speed is much the same.

When looking at single core performance, the 5700G is slower than the 5600X, though it's a mere three% reduction in single thread performance, and when compared to AMD's previous best desktop APU, the 3400G we're looking at a 39% increase in unmarried cadre operation.

Moving on, 7-zip pinch operation is only slightly ameliorate than the Core i7-10700K and therefore isn't much better than the six-core 5600X, or the older viii-core 3700X. And so while the performance is respectable, information technology's non exactly what y'all might have expected from an 8-core Zen 3 processor.

Compression operation looks a scrap amend and here the 5700G was 9% slower than the 5800X, which isn't also bad and information technology was able to outpace the 11900K, so relative to Intel information technology is a good result.

As seen in the Cinebench R20 unmarried thread test, the 5700G is slower than the 5600X, and equally a consequence it trailed the vi-core Zen 3 processor by a 10% margin when testing with Adobe After Effects. In fact, here nosotros're only looking at performance that'southward roughly equivalent to a Core i5-11400F or Ryzen 7 3700X.

It's a similar story in Adobe Photoshop, the 5700G is just able to match the Core i5-11400F, making it 12% slower than the 5800X and 5% slower than the 5600X.

Then nosotros accept Premiere Pro 2020 and here the 5700G was eleven% slower than the 5800X as it delivered 3700X/10700K like operation, and that made it more like a half dozen-core Zen 3 processor, rather than an eight-core model.

Blender is the last of the awarding benchmarks and here the 5700G was 8% slower than the 5800X, but almost 20% faster than the 5600X, so a reasonable result.

Ability Consumption

We often saw the 5700G delivering 3700X-like functioning, and in terms of ability usage information technology's also similar. That ways it also matches the 10600K. We're looking at a 15% reduction in total system usage when compared to the 5800X, so overall a good level of efficiency from this 8-cadre APU.

Integrated Graphics Testing

Time for some integrated graphics testing. For this data we're using the Vega 8 graphics of the 5700G, along with the iGPU in the 3400G and 11700. For comparing we have also added the Radeon RX 550, GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB versions, every bit well every bit the Radeon RX 5500 XT, all of which were tested with the Ryzen five 5600X.

For a modern and demanding title like Assassin's Creed Valhalla, the 5700G'south Vega graphics are simply not powerful enough, at least if you want better than a thirty fps experience. Playing at 1080p using the everyman quality settings, and even so the 5700G was skillful for just 33 fps on average. The but option remaining is to driblet down to 720p, and at that point things are getting very desperate.

All that said, the 5700G was 32% faster than the 3400G and... well, a lot faster than the Core i7-11700 and therefore is a better solution than any of the Intel desktop LGA1200 processors when it comes to gaming with the iGPU.

When compared to discrete graphics cards, nosotros're looking at Radeon RX 550/GeForce GT 1030-similar operation, and then whatever half decent modern graphics card is going to be miles faster. Take the Radeon RX 5500 XT, for example, which spat out 88 fps on average.

The 5700G is more than usable in less demanding games, such every bit Rainbow Six Siege. Here it was expert for 65 fps on average using the medium quality preset.

With low it is possible to keep frame rates above 60 fps at all times. This is roughly equivalent to RX 550 performance, and almost xl% faster than the 3400G which is a large comeback.

Horizon Cipher Dawn similar Assassinator's Creed Valhalla has been tested using the everyman possible quality settings at 1080p, and it'southward not possible to achieve playable performance with the 5700G, or any of these iGPUs for that matter.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is a much older demanding AAA title, simply once more even with the lowest possible quality settings information technology's non able to accomplish playable performance, depending on what you deem playable. The game is technically playable at 37 fps, but it's not exactly an enjoyable experience, at to the lowest degree in my opinion, I'd rather just play an older title in the franchise.

Doom Eternal is playable using the everyman quality settings and the experience wasn't half bad with frame rates staying in a higher place twoscore fps. This is actually a big bargain for the 5700G as the 32% performance increase over the 3400G made the game significantly better to play.

Every bit expected, given what we've seen in other more demanding games, it's not possible to play Decease Stranding with the 5700G as frame rates hover around thirty fps. This is a massive improvement from the 3400G, but sadly notwithstanding not very playable.

Clay 5 is somewhat playable with 39 fps on average and a one% low of 33 fps. This was a 22% increment over the 3400G, but not every bit impressive in terms of gains as what we've seen in other titles.

Biomutant is another new game that you tin can't run on the 5700G at 1080p, at least not at satisfactory frame rates. Hither we're looking at 27 fps on boilerplate and interestingly that's significantly downwards on the RX 550.

Watch Dogs: Legion also can't be played at 1080p despite using the lowest quality settings, hither we're looking at simply 28 fps on average, then the game wasn't playable.

Outriders using the lowest possible quality settings at 1080p is not playable with the 5700G and oddly wasn't any faster than the 3400G. I doubtable this is related to a driver event and mayhap we saw the same matter in Biomutant.

However, a game you can comfortably play is Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, here the 5700G managed 112 fps on average which is a 35% increment over the 3400G and pushed us into high refresh rate territory, which is pretty impressive. This is over twice what you'll get out of the 11700 or other 11th-gen Core series processor.

Information technology'due south worth noting that this performance was achieved using the medium quality settings, so yous can increase frame rates by dropping to low if you lot wish.

It was too possible to get ~lx fps on average in F1 2020 at 1080p using the everyman quality settings and this 28% performance increment over the 3400G was very noticeable and did lead to a amend gaming experience.

Finally we have Dota 2, which has been tested using the highest quality settings and here the 5700G was good for 73 fps on boilerplate, a 33% performance heave over the 3400G.

Dialling downwards the quality settings will net y'all significantly more than operation in Dota 2, especially given the CPU side of things is very powerful with the 5700G, then 1440p gameplay is possible hither.

Gaming Benchmarks (dGPU)

For testing gaming operation using a detached graphics card, nosotros picked the GeForce RTX 3090 and started with F1 2020. Here the 5700G is comparable to Intel'southward previous generation 8-core processor, the Core i7-10700K. When compared to the 5800X, it is 6% slower, which is not much but goes to show that halving the L3 cache has reduced functioning.

The 5700G was slightly slower than the 5800X when testing with Rainbow Vi Siege, but nosotros're talking well-nigh a small iv% margin and the APU was skillful for 485 fps, so that's pretty good. That said, as far as 8-cadre CPUs go, it was slower than tenth and 11th-gen Core parts and only 7% faster than the 10600K.

Next up we have Horizon Nothing Dawn and hither the 5700G was viii% slower than the 5800X, delivering 10600K-like performance with 151 fps on average. This remains a good result in the thou scheme of things, despite being the slowest Zen 3 CPU we've seen.

The 5700G did struggle a footling in Borderlands iii, averaging 151 fps and mirroring the performance of the 3700X and 3600, which is a bit disappointing. Information technology was also slower than the Core i3-10100, Core i7-7700K and a range of other CPUs, though it'southward worth noting that this isn't a stiff championship for Ryzen, and then the 5700G was just half-dozen% slower than the 5800X.

The margin to the 5800X widened in Lookout Dogs Legion. Here the 5700G was 12% slower rendering 101 fps on boilerplate, and once more that meant information technology was delivering 3700X-similar performance, making it slower than vi-core 10th-gen Core series processors.

Death Stranding benefits a lot from the massive L3 enshroud of the Zen 3 chiplet CPUs as here the 5800X allowed for 214 fps, making it the fastest CPU tested. The 5700G was 15% slower dropping to i5-11400F territory, though information technology was nonetheless 12% faster than the 3700X.

Interestingly, nosotros saw a big 20% reject in performance for the 5700G when compared to the 5800X, and that meant it was proficient for simply 132 fps on average, again delivering Ryzen seven 3700X and Core i5-10600K-like performance.

In Hitman two, the 5700G was a lot slower than the 5800X again, this time trailing past a fifteen% margin. This dropped it downward to the Core i5-10600K level, though it was eight% faster than the 3700X.

Boilerplate Functioning

When it comes to more than CPU express gaming with a discrete GPU, the Ryzen 7 5700G isn't astonishing, and information technology appears as though having all the cores crammed into a single die doesn't help, rather enshroud capacity plays a much more than vital role.

That doesn't mean functioning is bad and information technology'south the best we've seen from an AMD APU and then far. The 5700G is a powerful CPU that was able to match the gaming performance of Core i5-10600K and I call back well-nigh volition agree, that's a pretty not bad gaming CPU.

When compared to the 3400G, we're looking at a massive 88% increase in gaming performance although the new Zen 3-based APU is much more than expensive.

If you were expecting 5800X-levels of performance, you might be a bit disappointed to learn that on boilerplate the 5700G was xi% slower. Withal, practise notation we're using an RTX 3090 at 1080p, then those gaming at 1440p or college, with a fast but non extreme GPU, there'll be basically no difference between these two Ryzen 7 processors.

Who Is It For?

That's how the Ryzen seven 5700G performs, now what to make of it, as in what is this APU for? Who in our audience should consider purchasing it? Typically APU recommendations have been pretty straightforward, take the Ryzen 5 3400G, for case.

At $150, it'due south an affordable processor and with a budget motherboard and memory combo, it was possible to slice together the entry-level platform for well nether $400. Such a build was suitable for coincidental gaming, mostly at 720p, but it could game and was also excellent for utilise as a home theater PC.

The Ryzen 7 5700G though isn't suitable for budget builds. At $360 it costs roughly as much as the 3400G motherboard and memory combo. So if you're after a more premium dwelling theater PC setup, the 5700G might be suitable depending on the configuration you're going for. Right now, we experience the almost likely apply instance would be to use the integrated graphics of the 5700G as a stop-gap solution, make do with the Vega 8 graphics until you can buy a new graphics menu at a reasonable toll.

Those wishing to build a new desktop PC right at present can land parts similar the Ryzen 7 5800X beneath the MSRP, there are too loads of well priced B550 motherboards on the market, 16GB of DDR4-3200 memory tin be had for well under $100, and availability of all other components is very good: cases, ability supplies and storage. The merely thing stopping you from building a new gaming PC today is graphics card availability and pricing, so in a way the 5700G allows you lot to build now, and upgrade the graphics later.

But, those focused on gaming performance will notice that the 5700G is inferior to the Ryzen 5 5600X, and nonetheless information technology costs $60 more. We bring this up because for $100 yous can state a GeForce GT 1030 on eBay and that volition friction match or beat the performance of the integrated Vega 8 graphics.

And if you lot really care almost value, then you would ignore AMD birthday and go with Intel. The Core i5-10400F tin be had for merely $180, affording y'all a $180 budget for the graphics card and we've seen used 3GB GTX 1060 cards selling for that price over the past few weeks. That volition net you 100% more performance in mod games like Assassinator's Creed Valhalla, and more critically, enable playable frame rates. Once you tin can buy a more powerful graphics carte, the 10400F is basically identical to the 5700G in dGPU gaming performance anyway as we saw in our testing.

Bottom line, it'south going to be rare that the Ryzen seven 5700G will e'er make sense for gamers. This is an expensive Zen 3 part and in my opinion for this CPU to make sense it needs to be priced closer to $300.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • AMD Ryzen 7 5800X on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen five 5600X on Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-11700 on Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-10700K on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT on Amazon
  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 on Amazon
  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 on Amazon